top of page

Australia India Technology Impact Assessment: Comparative Study

Updated: 3 days ago

Discussion Paper, June 2025​​ (to see the paper, click the cover image)


Highlights

​​

  1. "Bilateral technology assessments between emerging strategic partners like Australia and India can help bridge geopolitical divides while advancing shared interests in tech governance" (Emphasizes the diplomatic value of joint assessments)


  2. "Critical technology cooperation must involve granular analysis of risks to peace/stability, such as quantum sensing applications in military radar systems"(Highlights need for technical specificity in assessments)

  3. "Trade wars are increasingly tech wars at their core, requiring new frameworks for managing competitive innovation without destabilizing international relations"(Links economic competition to tech policy)

  4. "Effective technology assessment requires tripartite collaboration between governments, private tech companies, and academic researchers"(Identifies key stakeholder groups)

  5. "Military applications of emerging technologies demand separate assessment frameworks from civilian uses due to different risk profiles"(Calls for bifurcated assessment approaches)

  6. "Semiconductor supply chains and 6G infrastructure require coordinated Indo-Pacific assessments to prevent fragmentation of technical standards"(Prioritises regional tech infrastructure)

  7. "Export controls on AI chips demonstrate how technology impact assessments must account for geopolitical alignment between private sector and national governments" (Notes public-private nexus in tech policy)

  8. "Multilateral technology assessments through forums like the Quad could help harmonize approaches between democracies facing similar challenges"(Advocates for institutionalised cooperation)

  9. "Biotechnology and green hydrogen require anticipatory governance frameworks that balance innovation incentives with stability risks"(Emphasizes proactive policy design)

  10. "Cyber-physical systems like subsea cables demand joint vulnerability assessments between maritime partners to ensure critical infrastructure resilience"(Identifies specific infrastructure priorities)​​​​​​


 
 
 

Comments

Rated 0 out of 5 stars.
No ratings yet

Commenting on this post isn't available anymore. Contact the site owner for more info.

NAVIGATE

JOIN SOCIAL CYBER UPDATE LIST

© 2022 SOCIAL CYBER GROUP

Sign up with your email and we will send you information on the activities of the Social Cyber institute and the Social Cyber Group.

ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

  • Social Cyber Institute
bottom of page